ekfrasi έγραψε:Εγώ θα ήθελα να δω πως θα του απαντούσαμε παράγραφο - παράγραφο στην κριτική του.
1. Κράζει ανελέητα το LF (σε κάποια σημεία, ίσως, όχι άδικα)
1. Parties offer collective intelligence and collective action
Modern government is extremely complex. Adopting policies on taxation, fiscal policy, employment strategies, and managing a legislative programme requires a lot more than gut-feelings about right and wrong. It requires comprehension of vast quantities of information, and mechanisms for processing it that are delegated and fragmented. It requires organisation. Indeed this is a key reason for the rise of political parties in the first place.
The Pirate Party proposes to rely on ‘liquid democracy’ where it would consult the preferences of its members (see http://www.piratenpartei.de/mitmachen/a ... -feedback/ or http://www.pirateparty.org.uk/wiki/Liquid_democracy). They run software called ‘liquid feedback,’ which generates real-time party member preferences on all policy issues confronted. This idea is related to a much wider problem of using direct democracy techniques in modern governance. Shall we take a straw poll on the present need for quantitative easing? Yes, me neither.
This is why we have representative democracy, and the division of labour required within political parties to have policy formed by people who know how to read the dense bits of the broadsheets. They then coordinate with each other to produce a coherent global political platform that reflects the general political principles of the party. True, that coordination and discipline may provide cover for inertia and elite access, but it also comprises vast networks of interests and channels for careful negotiation, deliberation, and the discipline required to prioritise and carry forward public policies on crucial issues.
‘Liquid democracy’ threatens to replace that with gut feelings fuelled by a cyberbalkanised media landscape.
the division of labour required within political parties to have policy formed by people who know how to read the dense bits of the broadsheets. They then coordinate with each other to produce a coherent global political platform that reflects the general political principles of the party.
Mr King, if mainstream parties adopt the main policies that the Pirate Party puts forward, then there would be no need for Pirate Parties. However,traditional parties refuse to compromise downwards. They choose to compromise upwards where the money is.
I would advise that you ask your self WHY is there even a need for a party with such a... funny name.
In the age of information, control of it is the new world war. In the past, feuds were created by the over concentration of wealth and military power. We Pirates are trying to put a set of rules down that will prevent the control of Information for the same purposes.
Our agenda is cut and clear. It is not to mock or to steal votes from other parties that have done... so well (this is mocking) but to change their politics for the betterment of mankind. I am really sorry if you cannot see any need for change.
pav έγραψε:...
Υ.Γ. Σχετικά με το κόμμα υπάρχει πάντα και η άλλη εναλλακτική, να μην ασχολούμαστε καθόλου με τα άλλα θέματα και να τ' αφήσουμε σε άλλους.
omissman έγραψε:Εχει ζουμι το αρθρο και πρεπει να συνταξουμε μια σοβαρη απαντηση επι της ουσιας . Κυριως για μας τους ιδιους.
Μπορουμε ;
Μέλη σε αυτή την Δ. Συζήτηση: 6 και 0 επισκέπτες